A few weeks ago, South Park had a trilogy of episodes called Imagination Land, in which terrorists waged war on our imaginations. Despite it being an hilarious series of episodes, I meant to comment on its relevance in the global situation we find ourselves in right now. As a satire it is perfect, even if most viewers won’t read that far into it. In the world today, terrorists have essentially hijacked our imaginations such that we live in fear of their reprisals. As a result, two wars still go on, a third potentially on it’s way in Iran.
In my usual reading of Ron Paul news, I came across this comment about the War on Terror on rollingstone.com, posted by user Republicae. I post it because it sums up what exactly is happening in the war and what the terrorists are really hoping to achieve: the bankruptcy of the United States.
~~
Eventually, it will become apparent that the ignorance of rage that characterizes our War on Terror , will betray this government, this nation and its people. We have thrown our natural rage into the game of war with those we consider terrorists and an immediate threat to our future however, in that rage we have overlooked several very important and perhaps critical issues that will affect our futures in ways that we are yet unaware.
In all the rhetoric, the hatred that we believe our enemies deserve and the reaction to their attacks we have, it seems, willingly played into their plans while pursuing our quest for revenge and defense . It is commonly stated that the devil is in the details, in this case that is absolutely correct. We have been confronted with an enemy that is not bound by convention, by international boundaries, by nationalities nor even by the values that we have long considered familiar in terms of Western or traditional warfare. There is a very important and critical disparity between the style and effectiveness of our enemies and those of our military efforts based upon our policies. This contrast is most distinct when viewing the degree of effort and expense used to affect each side of the conflict. There is also a very distinguishing difference between the ideals and motivations between the two forces; those differences are rarely taken into consideration and yet because of the nature of this conflict it plays an extremely important role in the overall effectiveness of each side in the conflict itself.The main contrast, that is seldom mentioned or considered when judging the effectiveness of each side s role in this conflict, is the disparity of expenditures needed by each side to effect substantial damage on the other. In the case of the terrorists , the level of expenditure is miniscule compared to that of the United States. As is common with all super-states , our response is natural to the characteristics of such a super-state . In our eyes, the proper response is to throw everything you can at the enemy and it will, at least in our minds, do the job. The problem is that it rarely does in such cases and there is plenty of evidence to support that fact.In the case of al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, the need to produce massive attacks is not needed, especially after the events of 9/11. In fact, a terrorist group need not attack at all, but only use its ability to induce fear, sometimes massive fear, as the ultimate effective and extremely inexpensive tool of their trade. Because of such tactics of potential terror, they need only threaten and it not only achieves a predictable result, but also prompts their enemies to expend massive amounts of resources to defend against the perceived potential attack.
While the threat of physical attack is always to be considered real and dangerous, the more effective and therefore most insidious attack is that of psychological terror. Psychological terror, particularly if it is not recognized, is extremely dangerous because it has the potential of effecting drastic changes in the behavior and character of a society; not to mention the manner and means of the response that society willing to take both domestically and in its dealings with other nations. Psychological terror causes the victim nation to react in ways that while appearing defensive can exacerbate the entire situation and increase both external and internal dangers. It causes reason to be set aside for reaction and places the country in a position where effective decision-making is compromised. The nations center of gravity is pushed off balance, its traditional character is morphed into a vision that eventually becomes unrecognizable and its laws become disposable. Eventually, the effects of the terror are a success and psychological conquest has effectively changed the way the people of the country see themselves, see others, live their lives, believe, behave and conduct their business and affairs. The country s politics too can easily become contorted, manipulated and, in some cases, extreme.
Both physical and psychological terror will find its ultimate use in causing the economic resources of the country to hemorrhage, bleeding the life-blood from the most vulnerable sector of the society. Given the differences between the expenditures of the terrorists and our own expenditures, it is easy to see that eventually the expense of such a war will take an increasingly heavy toll. Once again, it doesn t take an actual attack to press a country into a massive and extremely costly response; it only takes the correct application of fear to implement its effectiveness on the country s resources.
While our rage, combined with degree political expediency, has caused us to choose to believe certain things about our enemies, many of those beliefs are not based upon fact or intelligent assessment, but solely upon that rage. In that rage we blind ourselves to a reality that is not only necessary to understand our enemy, but also to effectively counteract and defeat the potency of their methods.
For those who have never read The Principles of War by Carl von Clausewitz, he presented a very powerful argument on the methods of defeating an enemy through attacking that enemy at his Center of Gravity. Now, in our rage we might not think that the terrorists would consider such a strategy as it is spelled out in The Principles of War, particularly because many of us have a carefully manicured vision of the Islamic extremists, but in fact, those crazed Islamofascists have not only read the book, but they have instituted many of the principles found throughout its pages. Abu-Ubayd al-Quarshi stated in his essay: A Lesson in War , that not only had he read it, but that al Qaeda would utilize those principles in its attack on the United States. Of course, in our rage, our anger, we rarely consider such facts or understand the importance of recognizing that our enemies are not just Islamic crazies, but warriors intent on using any and all methods to achieve their goal of defending their religion and their lands from what they view as invaders.
Now, to understand what al-Quarshi was talking about, let s take everything about Islam out of his writings and then read it as though it were a simple plan and explanation of their purpose: